Tuesday, October 23, 2007

i know, i know...

i have been neglectful.

please accept my apologies.




i wish i had some sort of deep, meaningful and inspiring message to make up for my absence.
but alas, i do not.


well, maybe:

"i don't know" seems to be showing up more and more and more and more. and more. i am uncertain if i am able to stress that to any degree of satisfaction.

there is so much we do not see and so much that we do not comprehend that it is, at times, overwhelming -- difficult-to-breath overwhelming.

the universe is so much more expansive than the limits of our own vision.
maybe it is time to start acting as though that is the case.

Friday, October 05, 2007

a sick sense of humor

hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia, noun, the fear of long words.


let that ruminate for a moment in your mind.
though i doubt the existence of this phobia, think of the of the cruel nature of the person who came up with this word.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

patting myself on the back

January 3, 2007 - September 12, 2007

it was in this period of time that i lost a total 50 pounds.
i am 15.6% less of what i used to be.


i believe a 'congrats' or two is in order...

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Separation

of late, my policy on making comments or stating my opinion about my stance on government and God has been to refrain. however, i consider something as general as Separation of Church and State to be important enough to render comment.

here in Texas, there is couple (who has children in the Texas public school system) who has filed suit against various state officials for the addition and use of the phrase 'Under God' in the Texas flag pledge and the required presence of the American pledge and the moment of silence each morning in Texas schools. Texas added the 'Under God' phrase to the Texas flag pledge citing consistency with the American flag pledge being their goal.

i must say: i applaud this couple. of the Bible Belt in America, Texas may not be the buckle, but it is at least the over-grown pot-luck supper belly of it.

in the Dallas Morning News article on this very story, the Texas state solicitor general Ted Cruz is quoted defending the pledges and moment of silence as saying, "In both the nation and the state there is a long tradition of acknowledging the role of the Almighty." i realise that our justice and law system is based largely upon precedent and that tradition is considered virtually sacred; however, if the law of Separation of Church and State is to be upheld -- the State can in no way entreat her citizens to believe anything religious in nature.

the will of the majority is honored, yes; but the rights and freedoms of the minority MUST be protected.

as Christians, we are not called to force upon anyone our ways or beliefs. Christ does not force belief or obedience upon us -- therefore, we should not force. many say we are a Christian nation -- founded upon Christian values. i would say in response that Israel expected a Messiah-King that would come to earth as a conqueror to depose the Roman government's control over the Jews. when Christ came as the Messiah he came on His terms offering freedom and abundant life. He did not come on their terms. our own expectations of who Christ is to us and to the world are those of ancient Israel. we want a Christ who will conquer by being strong and forceful. but that is not who He is. victory is gained through servanthood. Christ came to serve, and this should be our mark; not domination in government or arrogant superiority in belief. oppression for ANY reason is still oppression. as Lily Tomlin said, "The problem with winning a rat race is that, in the end, you're still a rat."

i understand that Christian parents wish for positive, Godly influence upon their children. then those parents should be that influence and stop expecting or requiring our government to fill that role. government is to be public... for all who live in the country -- religious belief is personal.

to the parents fighting against this injustice: good work. i'm behind you.

Monday, August 27, 2007

physical contact

as children we were taught: "keep your hands to yourself." as in most things, we were admonished to abstain rather than to self-controlling moderation. i realise this rule is usually instituted to keep children from hitting or pestering each other. but, how does this lesson shape our relationships with others? why is it so awkward for grown up friends -- or even grown ups within families -- to stand physical contact?

when my niece was a toddler, she would always be sitting on a lap or holding a hand; she always wanted to be in physical contact with someone.

when i was a toddler -- this story comes via my mother -- and woke up in the middle of the night, as most toddlers do, i would call out for my mom or dad to stay with me until i fell back asleep. my mom said that i would always want to be held closely, to be in physical contact with whoever was there to put me back to sleep.

why do we discourage physical contact so much? is it so horrible? so many children and adults have so little contact with other people.

as the reader would suspect, i have a theory. and as it is such, any comments or complaints assuming its absolute accuracy will be ignored. furthermore, this is meant as a generality and will not concern specific instances:

our entertainment, our news, our literature, our conversations all link physical contact with sexual intimacy. and it seems that many people, adult or otherwise, link any physical contact past hand shakes, brief 'side-saddle' hugs, pats on the back, etc. as an indication of sexual attraction or more.

now, don't mistake my theory for naïvete about the very real presence of inappropriate contact between people. yet, because of those who make physical contact in order to harm or out of perverted desires a fear has developed among the well-intentioned: the fear of being mistaken -- which holds fear-striking consequences -- for someone with ulterior motives.

what are we so afraid of in having physical contact with those who are close to us? do we keep forbidding physical contact in the name of fear? in the name of social commandment? many adults are out in society longing for contact end up feeling like they are disgusting because no one will be close to them... many children wonder if something is wrong with them or if they have done something wrong... many teenagers are being taught that physical contact is only connected with sexual activity: all adding to the cycle which turns out destructive, perverted contact which turns out fear which turns out the absence of appropriate contact.

do we let the harmful ruin one of the most basic of human interaction?
or do we reclaim it?

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

a CNN poll found that

one in four adult Americans read ZERO books last year.

this hurts my soul.




deeply.

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Dear Dallas Driver,

Why do you hate me so much? I'm just a poor, Missouri boy from the sticks.

Why is it that you take so long to depart from an intersection when the light turns from red to green? But when I take more than one second to depart, you honk your horn at me as though I'd ignored some unspoken social moree?

How is it that you will drive 60+ mph down the street, but feel uncomfortable making a turn at speeds greater than 5 mph?

Could you explain to me please, why you feel so compelled, even though I be the only other car on the road, to pull out in front of me at the last moment?

Oh, and permit me one more: what would cause you to apply pressure to your brakes when approaching a green lighted intersection? Are you afraid it will turn its back to you and change to that lovely saffron hue warning you to impede your own progress? I doubt that is so, since I've seen you running past those golden admonishings with me.

I'm going to be honest: I don't care much for you or your driving habits.



Yours,

Albert Levi Crump

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

Soap Box

Jeremiah 29.11 is about Israel... not whatever you want.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

To All Five of the People Who Read my Blog:

please pardon my brief absence from posting. between moving apartments and work, things have been a touch more hectic.

i wish i had something of interest concerning my life to share with you, but alas... pizazz is far and few between these days.

in other news of interest, my parish's Archbishop will be arriving this weekend for his Visitation trip. i'm extraordinarily excited to meet him; and i am so probably because i've never even met anyone 'higher up' than a priest.



of your charity, pray for the 21 South Korean hostages being held by the Taliban. also, mention the two, including the group's leader, that have already been executed. the Taliban demands that certain rebel leaders be released; after each deadline passes and until that demand is met, they have promised to execute one more hostage until they are all gone. the South Korean church group went to Afghanistan to provide volunteer medical aid.

Saturday, July 21, 2007

i want

...to move far away from where i am.

...to wake up in the morning and not curse.

...to be completely independent of everything and everyone.

...to live in the woods for two years and learn how be content.

...to abandon empty hopes and relinquish foolish dreams.

...to be myself.


who is keeping me from accomplishing these:
Albert Levi Crump

Sunday, July 15, 2007

self-commentary

What's money? A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.
- Bob Dylan

i am not doing what i want to do. but change will come in time...

Sunday, July 08, 2007

an admittance

a few years ago, i received a book from my then-best friend. it even had a nice little note in the front of it; written by him to me. in the inscription, the reason i had received this book was listed: because the main character of the book reminded him of me.

upon leaving school for my Christmas break, i immediately began to read the book and finished it within one sitting. he was spot-on. the main character was rather like me. i would tell you more, but i would rather you read the book.

after reading the book and realizing how well this friend saw me... i struggled with how i felt about it. i was content, yet uneasy; breathed a sigh of relief and gasped a breath of anxiety.

barely a year later, the friendship ended.

"His mind reeled. Now, empowered to ask questions of utmost rudeness — and promised answers — he could, conceivably, ... ask someone, ... : 'Do you lie?'
But he would have no way of knowing if the answer he received were true."

The Giver by Lois Lowry.

not sure why i am writing on this. it has been on my mind a lot lately.

Sunday, July 01, 2007

Franz Kafka

one of my favorite short story writers is, obviously, Franz Kafka. while he is best known for "The Metamorphosis" -- an excellent read -- i rather enjoy his other, lesser-known stories. one in particular has been sticking out in my mind: "An Old Leaf."

in this two-and-a-half page saga we learn of a land that is being tormented and oppressed by "nomads" who turn the small, feudal town surrounding the Emperor's castle from a "peaceful square" into a "veritable sty." as the story develops, we find that the nomads virtually hold the town ransom against itself... forcing capitulation from the townsfolk, namely the artisans. the cobbler, who happens to be our story-teller, tells that it is impossible to speak or reason with the nomads who care little to learn the language of the town which they are literally destroying.

the end of the story shows the Emperor making a rather rare, albeit submissive, appearance in a window of his outer wall to see what these nomads are doing to his town. the townspeople, seeing his acquiescence, conclude that in light of their lord's inability -- or, perhaps, unwillingness -- the responsibility of saving their town falls into their hands:

"The salvation of our fatherland is left to us craftsmen and tradespeople, but we are not equal to such a task, nor indeed have we ever claimed to be capable of it. This is a misunderstanding, and it is proving the ruin of us."

misunderstandings - whatever their form take - can keep us from getting rid of the things that are killing us. this morning at Mass, one of the passages was from St Paul's letter to the church in Galatia. St Paul tells us that we have been made free in Christ... furthermore, that we are not to submit ourselves to the yoke [or burden] of slavery ever again. many of us are like the townspeople in Franz Kafka's story. many of us, like the cobbler, submit ourselves not only the rule of these nomads but to the idea we are no longer free. however, there is one grave and liberating difference in our story from Kafka's...

our Lord came to our town.

Saturday, June 30, 2007

sometimes

sometimes i wish i had more to say than, "i am here."

but, most of the time i do not.






i am here.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

prayer

"I have come to the conclusion that when all is said and done, the only real prayer I can say is that of the blind beggar in the gospels, 'Lord Jesus, that I may receive my sight'. Let me see the real root cause of that spiritual sophistication which separates me from God. Let me see God's real presence encompassing me, enfolding me, always everywhere. Let me see wherever I am or whatever I am doing, whether I feel tired or excited, angry or amused, a success or a failure, fed up or enthusiastic, a bundle of nerves or calm and quiet, miserable or happy, optimistic or in despair, whatever it may be, let me see that all I have to do is to turn simply to God and say, 'Hello, it is me'. There is no need to stand on ceremony because I am at home in my Father's house. And there is no need to keep up appearances by pretending that I am a worse person than I am, or even a better person, because God knows what I am like infinitely better than I do myself. 'Hello, it is me, Your old friend and Your old enemy, Your loving friend who often neglects You, Your complicated friend, Your utterly perplexed and decidedly resentful friend, partly loving, partly hating, partly not caring. It is me'."


The Simplicity of Prayer, H. A. Williams, C.R.

Friday, June 22, 2007

my most recent fortune cookie

"A faithful friend is a strong defense."









one of my readers will know how true that is. though, i am sure others will also understand...

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

a couple of stories

one is pleasant, the other serious.

story one:

i was sitting at a red light, patiently waiting for it to turn green... happily satisfied with my lane choice (the far left lane, right next the turn lane). the Coldplay song i was listening to was politely interrupted by a "Excuse me, sir?" the elderly lady in the car to my left then continued, "May I get in front of you when the light turns green?" i responded, "Of course!" it was the most pleasant driving experience i've ever encountered... and it was rather refreshing for a jaded-small-town driver like myself. the light turned green and i allowed the kind lady in front of me. i drove away from the intersection feeling rather hopeful about the world.

story the other:

i had a wonderful chat with the priest of the parish i've been attending. i spoke with him about some more of my past. specifically about my depression and prayer. i tried my best to explain the nature of my depression to him and the nature of my prayers concerning it... and how they have changed over the years.

he spoke with me about my prayers and it was encouraging. however, he said that he is not in the business of making me feel better... he is in the business of bringing me closer to YHWH. he even preceded what he said with a caveat, which was taken into consideration... but i knew that what he was about to say would be good for me whether or not i wanted to hear it. he said that, perhaps, my depression is God's way of making me holy and that it might not ever change (see ref: St Terese of Avila). i'm brave enough to write that i immediately began weeping. even if this turns out to be not true, it is possible. a possibility i have to learn to accept. i know this next phrase will perhaps ruin my post by being overly sentimental... but Green Day might have been right... "Don't ask why. It's not a question, but a lesson learned in time."


i'm ready.

Sunday, June 17, 2007

reflections

- sometimes the most well intentioned people can be the most harmful.

- at the end of the day, i look at the day's events one by one and wonder what i could have done differently. and a lot of the time i quit half way through.

- i like the scars i have from my childhood injuries. it makes me feel like it was somewhat normal.

- my strangest dreams occur just as i am waking up for the day and i often have trouble discerning them from reality.

- many people think i'm rather smart... which is rather puzzling as i've never felt like i am nor have i ever felt like i have acted as though i am.

- i like to fall asleep reading.

- i feel most comfortable when it is quiet... and i am in bed... and have just come out of a deep sleep... just before dawn.

- i have a particularly good long term memory and often hear a friend or family member tell the same story twice. but, i rarely stop them from telling it again. i love the sound of the voices of my family and friends.

- when i learn that my family has gathered or is gathering without me... i usually get pretty sad about it.

- i grew up in the same town and same house my entire life. usually, when i share this the listener is quite impressed. i used to be jealous of people who moved around a lot. i'm not anymore.

- i use the number keypad on the right side of the keyboard exclusively. i never use the numbers that are above the letters. i'm not sure why this is so.

Monday, June 11, 2007

I'm just a regular guy...

...who has lost a considerable amount of weight since the New Year. On this day i am 30 pounds lighter than i was January 3rd. and i feel fine bragging about it. why? because i feel skinnier. and it feels pretty damn good.

i began reading Marcus Aurelius' Meditations. fairly interesting so far. i think many people don't understand the Stoics... and i was one of them. so far, and i may be incorrect, it seems as though they advocate constancy of character, despite circumstances, through "self-government" (self-discipline) and detatchment from events. not in a way that encourages no emotion... but in a way that encourages constancy of character.

also, i've been thinking a lot about a certain passage in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5.33-37):

"Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.’ But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil."

this passage first came to my distinct attention when i took the required ethics class in college. we were, apparently so, talking about honesty... truth-telling... lying... etc. and the professor (good ol' Byron) asked us why people seem to find it necessary to say the phrase "i promise." most of the responses were "to show you really mean what you say." and his response, in light of the passage we had just read, was, "why should we have to say that?" i felt rather convicted. and i do now again. i hope that my word becomes so certain that do not have to use the phrase "i promise" just to prove myself to be reliable.

i find honesty to be a rather complex discipline. it seems a lot less black and white than a lot make it out to be. not as in: what is wrong and right. but more along the lines of: what is appropriate? is there a guideline for what is appropriate and when is it so? i'm sure it's more of a mindset of approach rather than a checklist. a mindset sounds more appealing anyway...



i long so much for a simpler life. one where i don't have to drive everywhere i wish to go; or work to pay bills so i can work; or live in a town whose vocabulary doesn't include "courteous" or "kind" or even "civility." and i'm not just referring to the traffic.

though, there are few who make the concrete jungle of a world worth it.

forgive my ramblings,
alc

Saturday, June 09, 2007

the kingdom of God (KOG)

it has been a while since i've posted. though... i am certain people don't read this. perhaps it is time to change this.

despite what i reveal in my actions... i am rather easily bothered. i think it is because deep down... i am an idealist -- though my actions are realist. i am sure most would label this as hypocrisy: thinking things should be one way and acting as though the way they are is fine. i would ask you to be less harsh. though prerogative belongs to you.

on xanga, a friend of mine posted a blog because he was upset with the current and unwanted (and unBiblical) mix of Christ's Kingdom and the American dream. in comment, someone responded in defense of the USA/KOG mix. usually, i am lackadaisical about what people believe and am riveted about the why [the reason] and how [the reasoning] behind that belief. briefly put: i don't care what you believe as long as you can defend it.

however, there is one area where this rule finds exception... and even in that case, it is, really, a more severe form of the rule.

before i broach the exception (though, you could probably correctly guess its identity at this point), i will present a proviso: "Because God told me" is a poor reason. i realize that God is more than capable of telling people whatever He jolly well pleases. unless God literally spoke to you in an audible voice... don't use that phrase. it carries with it extraordinarily large undertones that you probably don't intend to use. and besides, God sent an angel to the Mother of His Only Son to tell her about His Birth... so show some humility.

the exception:
America and its 'place' in the Kingdom of God.

i don't know what it is about the topic... but i get ready to throw down anytime i hear someone articulate their take on the nature of the relationship between our country and YHWH. the teachings of Christ and John and Paul seem to not lay the groundwork for such a close relationship between God and government. it is true that Romans 13 speaks to this:

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God.

yet, consider Revelation 18 and its plea:

Then I heard another voice from heaven saying,
‘Come out of her, my people,
so that you do not take part in her sins,
and so that you do not share in her plagues;
for her sins are heaped high as heaven,
and God has remembered her iniquities.
Render to her as she herself has rendered,
and repay her double for her deeds;
mix a double draught for her in the cup she mixed.
As she glorified herself and lived luxuriously,
so give her a like measure of torment and grief.
Since in her heart she says,
“I rule as a queen;
I am no widow,
and I will never see grief”,
therefore her plagues will come in a single day—
pestilence and mourning and famine—
and she will be burned with fire;
for mighty is the Lord God who judges her.’

And the kings of the earth, who committed fornication and lived in luxury with her, will weep and wail over her when they see the smoke of her burning; they will stand far off, in fear of her torment, and say,
‘Alas, alas, the great city,
Babylon, the mighty city!
For in one hour your judgement has come.’

before you think i'm transposing this onto America, please do not. "And the kings of the earth"... i am transposing this onto government. again, be patient with what you think about what i am explaining. i have been thinking about this type of 'contradiction' that presents itself many times in Scripture. i doubt that i am the only one to think on or believe this... but i believe that a theology (not the right word, still looking for it) of Delicate Balance is needed. i used to call it theology of moderation.

so, are we to respect government as it has been instituted and given authority by God? yes. are we to be wary of governments as they will be judged for their actions and affiliations with the Evil One? yes. it is a balance. do not be too disinterested nor should we be too involved.

forgive my ramblings,
alc